Home

Advertisement

Writer's Block: Grab and Go

  • Apr. 6th, 2009 at 9:46 AM

Scenario: For exactly 1 minute, you get access to all the databases of all the intelligence agencies in the world (CIA, FBI, KGB, MI-5, etc). What do you want to find out before time is up and you're caught and jailed forever?


View 503 Answers

CIA.  JFK.

Prisoners' Rights

  • Apr. 3rd, 2009 at 10:12 AM


Senator Graham recently said it was “dangerous and naïve” to afford the detainees being held at Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan the same rights as those held captive in Guantanamo. And with that statement, Sen. Graham could not be more wrong.

The only thing “dangerous” about our actions over the past eight years is the policy that President Bush set saying that the guidelines of the Geneva Convention (and the U.S. Constitution, for that matter) do not apply to prisoners of the global war on terror. Following the events of 9/11, The U.S. went to a very dark place when we went away from those values that made America so great in the first place.

President Obama is finally putting us back on track by ordering a report be generated no later than July reviewing all of our detention policies, including detainees having the right to challenge their imprisonment. “Habeas corpus” is one of the foundations of our legal system, and it is absolutely essential that wherever there is American soil – whether it be here at home or on a military base abroad – all the rights of being in America follow, no matter who you are.

Yes, it is necessary to take prisoners of war to obtain information that will help defeat the enemy, but when we dismiss our most basic principles, we become no better than those we have vowed to defeat.
 

In 2002, the Bush Administration declared that the detainees of the War on Terror were not eligible for rights under the Geneva Conventions. Do you agree with the Bush Administration's decision? How might you have handled it differently?

Sponsored by "Inside Guantanamo" on National Geographic Channel. Premieres Sunday at 9P et/pt.


View 203 Answers

That is quite possibly the worst decision the U.S. has made in a very, very long time.  Just read in the paper today one judge was trying to prevent being able to "move detainees physically beyond the reach of the Constitution and detain them indefinitely."  We went to a very dark place following 9/11.  And when we revoke the Geneva Convention, we become no better than those we are vowing to defeat - period.  Wherever there is American soil - whether it be here at home, in a foreign embassy, or on a military base - the Constitution applies to everyone there.  Of course it is necessary to take prisoners of war to obtain information on how best to defeat the enemy, but we absolutely cannot do so at the expense of all our morals and values.

TCAW!!!!

  • Apr. 3rd, 2009 at 7:56 AM

Did you know that April 1-7 is Testicular Cancer Awareness Week?  If yer a dude, check the boys.  If yer a dudette, check'em for him!  (Saved my life.)

Days after his inauguration, President Barack Obama signed into effect plans to close the Guantanamo Bay detention facility within the next year. What do you think should be done with its remaining detainees?

Sponsored by “Inside Guantanamo” on National Geographic Channel. Premieres Sunday at 9P et/pt.


View 283 Answers

Good question!  Most importantly, remember that we are obligated to operate under the guidelines of the Geneva Convention, which, for the past eight years, we have almost completely dismissed.  Also, there is such a thing as the Constitution, and more specifically, an idea known as "habeas corpus."  The detainees should be scattered to maximum security facilities around the country, and immediately they should determine whether there exists enough evidence to try these prisoners with some sort of crime (war crime or otherwise).  If there is sufficient evidence, give them the fair and speedy trial to which they are entitled.  If there is not, the only choice is to let them free and do as much as humanly possible to ensure their safety.

Thanks Gov. Sanford!

  • Mar. 31st, 2009 at 9:41 AM

I hope your 2012 Presidential bid is worth it!  Actually, no I don't.  I just hope my wife - a damn good public school teacher - has a job next year....

http://charleston.net/news/2009/mar/31/possible_school_cuts_outlined77014/

What's up with these friggin' morals?

  • Mar. 31st, 2009 at 8:21 AM

So there I was yesterday, going to the Navy Exchange to buy some new sneakers (because my current shoes were only shoes by definition in that they pretty much covered my feet) as well as sunscreen for the Flowertown Festival, Emma's baseball cleats, and a new Miracle Gro hose attachment thingy because I lost my last one. I did find a suitable pair of sneakers for the low Navy price of $49.99, along with all the aforementioned goodies.

The cashier was certainly friendly - as friendly as someone at the NEX can be, at least - and rang up all my items, with the exception of my shoes. The total came to about $46, and this obviously being less than my Nike's, I astutely deduced that she had not rung up my shoes, and she had already taken the security device off and everything.

So decision time: do I do the smart thing, save my family of five $50 that could be used for groceries or a new Wii game? Or should I be a "damned idealistic fool" and let her know that she forgot to do her one job and ring up my sneakers.

You know me - I'm an idiot. I told her. She did manage to mumble "thank you" for the fact that I was so honest, and helped her to keep the job for which she was evidently underqualified.

So my question is why? Why did I feel the need to not take advantage of the fact that I could have saved fifty bucks. And if she wasn't smart enough to figure out that all my items came up to less than 1 item costed, no one else would have been the wiser. And if the answer is "because it's the right thing to do," what makes it so "right?"

I'm pretty sure if it had been Wal-Mart, I would've taken the free shoes...

Sen. Ford's Answer to Our Education Woes

  • Mar. 25th, 2009 at 9:39 AM

"The money is not for that school. The money is to educate little Johnny." Wrong, Sen. Ford. The money IS for that school. IN ORDER TO educate little Johnny. In a time of such economic uncertainty, why should we waste money to allow our children to leave the public school system instead of fixing those schools we deem to be failing?

Sen. Ford proposes to give a tax credit of $3450 the parents of a child who attends a failing public school to assist them in placing that child in a "better" private school. Let's see, how about instead of doing that, we spend that $3450 on: up-to-date textbooks, up-to-date technology, school repairs, after-school activities, and dare we say it? Actually paying teachers what they are worth.

My wife is a public school teacher, and I can tell you Senator from firsthand experience that our teachers are not the problem, and not the reason we have "failing schools." We have failing schools because our state and federal governments are failing us - as seen here.

Time to stop expecting Washington to fix all of our problems with blank stimulus checks when we have the power to fix all of our problems right here at home.


Death on a Bun...yummy!

  • Mar. 24th, 2009 at 8:44 AM


So if anybody still carries the delusion that America is not living in excess (and hence the cause for all of our current problems), a minor league baseball team has done their part to smash all those delusions by making...wait for it...a 5/3 POUND BURGER!  This thing packs (obviously) 5/3 of a pound of All-American fatty beef, lettuce, tomato, cheese, mayo, etc etc etc resulting in an impressive 5000 (five thousand) calories!

You know, the Roman Empire had the attitude of "eat, drink, and be merry" right before it....awwww...nevermind, just pass me one of those burgers!

Wonder why we're Godless? Here's a hint....

  • Mar. 11th, 2009 at 9:21 AM


http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/americas/03/11/brazil.rape.abortion/index.html?iref=mpstoryview

So yesterday I wrote about the survey that indicated that Americans are going away from religion, especially Christianity.  And more specifically: Catholicism.  Why is this happening?  The above article may be a huge hint.

Imagine you have a daughter and she is nine years old.  God forbid, the unthinkable happens.  She gets raped.  To add insult to an already grave injury, the worst case scenario happens.  She gets pregnant.  With twins.  Besides wanting to tear the rapist limb from limb and jam those limbs down his throat, what do you do now? 

I would imagine the last thing you would want to do is let the pregnancy go on.  Not just because it was caused by rape (because many good people have chosen to keep and love their babies caused by this heinous act), but because your daughter is nine years old.  There is no way the pregnancy would be without significant risks.  Now I'm no doctor, but I would venture to say that the probability of the babies surviving would be relatively low, and if they did they would undoubtedly face countless health issues throughout their lives.  And even more importantly, what about your daughter?  A nine year old is not designed to carry a baby, much less twins.

A group of doctors in Brazil realized this, so they performed an abortion for the little girl, which I would say probably saved her life.  What thanks did they get?  They got excommunicated from the Catholic Church because of what they did.

So you would at least think the rapist would have gotten excommunicated as well, right?  Absolutely not.  Why?  Because "A graver act than (rape) is abortion, to eliminate an innocent life."  I'm not usually at a loss for words, but...wow.  I always believe abortion should be the last option, but in this case, undoubtedly necessary.

Why are people moving away from religion?  You decide.

What story of personal greatness, achievement or success would your co-workers or friends be surprised to learn about you?

Sponsored by Nature Made


View 360 Answers

Voted "Most Likely to be President" in high school.


....still working on that.

Writer's Block: Passing Time

  • Mar. 10th, 2009 at 11:32 AM

When you're stuck in a boring class or meeting, what's your favorite way to keep yourself entertained (or at least from falling asleep)?


View 500 Answers

Usually daydream about how great it'll be when I take over the world.

A Godless America? I don't think so.

  • Mar. 10th, 2009 at 8:11 AM

Last night Bill O'Reilly reported on a recent survey conducted by ARIS (American Religious Self-Indentification Survey) which showed that between 1990 and today, the percentage of Americans that called themselves Christian dropped from 86 to 76.  Additionally, 20% of Americans now choose to associate themselves with no defined religion, with Catholicism taking the biggest hit in numbers.  The conclusion, therefore, is that today more and more Americans are becoming "Godless" beings and hold no faith to speak of.

I believe that can't be farther from the truth.

On the contrary, I believe we are simply in the midst of a massive redefining of how we view religion in America and around the world.  Perhaps a second Reformation, if you will.  Much like the Reformation of the 16th century, Americans are seeing the obvious flaws with organized religion, including the omnipresent "do as I say, not as I do" mentality of many preachers and churchgoers alike.  So, they choose to not be a part of the hypocrisy and opt to not associate themselves with a certain church. 

Does that then mean they have no faith?  That they are Godless heathens?  Absolutely not.  Just because a person chooses not to go to church every Sunday does not mean they don't share many of the same thoughts, feelings, and faith in God.  They just choose to exercise their religious beliefs in a more personal way.  At home, for example - where God belongs the most.  I can honestly say that I do not attend church on a regular basis, but my kids do.  Not because they have to, but because they genuinely want to.  And that's the way it should be.  Religion should not be force fed down a child's throat on a young age.  Instead they should be given the option to attend church, and they should decide for themselves if that is something in which they wish to participate.  Mandatory church attendance will only go on to cause greater distrust in organized religion later in life.  Church should be a place of fun and togetherness, not a place of "fire and brimstone" where you learn about all the things God doesn't like about us meager humans.

And because I don't go to church, does that mean my family has no faith or belief in God?  Negative.  If anything, I'd say deep down we are much more religious than the individual who goes to church and then leaves the parking lot afterwards and proceeds to lie, cheat, steal, etc etc etc (but it's okay because they went to Church).  Just remember: if you do go to church, take what you learned with you when you leave, and make sure you apply it all throughout the week, not just two hours on Sunday morning...and then maybe we'll see the churches start to fill up again.

Tags:

Writer's Block: Prohibited

  • Dec. 5th, 2008 at 6:40 AM

Today marks the passing of the 21st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which repealed Prohibition. It might seem crazy to us now, but alcohol was illegal in the U.S. for 13 years. What common vice do you think is most likely to be outlawed in the future?


View 500 Answers

Cell phones.  Can you imagine that black market?  Geeky yet gangsta.....

A Great Cause

  • Nov. 30th, 2008 at 12:02 PM

Well, thanks to support from fine folks like yourselves, my wife's fundraising project for her classroom got completely funded, and her kids will be receiving their new books shortly.  The project was so successful, she has decided to place another project online, and this time it is to give her kids what they've been begging for - copies of the Twilight series.  Her school only has so many copies, and since this is one of the few stories her kids will actually read, she would like to have some more so that all that want to read the books have the opportunity.  As always, your contributions (as little as a dollar) are tax deductible and go towards a great cause.  The link is below, and I thank you in advance for your support.

http://www.donorschoose.org/donors/proposal.html?id=231435

While walking in a winter wonderland can be fun in theory, it makes shopping a bit of a drag. Do you plan on doing your holiday shopping online or in-stores this season?

Sponsored by Best Buy


View 225 Answers

In stores.  And on Black Friday.  Mostly because I'm pretty sadistic...

There Was No Father (A Star Wars Fanfic)

  • Nov. 21st, 2008 at 7:28 AM


Title: There Was No Father
Rating: PG-13
Place In Timeline: Right before Episode II
Characters: Shmi
Short Summary: Shmi claimed Anakin had no father, but does anyone really believe that?

WHAT REALLY HAPPENED )

David and Goliath: Retold

  • Nov. 20th, 2008 at 11:45 AM

The following is the beginning to a short story that I will soon be submitting to a Biblical story contest.  I'd love to hear what you guys think of the beginning...

Damn the vultures.  Their silent enjoyment of those we have lost mocks our struggle.  For forty days we have been feeding their undeserving bellies.  The height of this hill only makes it easier to see the sickening feast that we have disgracefully provided for them.  Thirty-nine bodies lie, their eyeballs, fingers, and toes already picked away, encircled overhead by those who look forward to our defeat every morning at the hands of the goliath whom the Philistines have chosen to crush our dreams of victory. 

 

Keep on readin'! )

WTF is wrong with that police department?

  • Nov. 19th, 2008 at 1:39 PM

I don't know if you guys have kept up with this story, but I am referring to the case of an 8-year old boy accused of shooting and murdering his own father and another man who lived with them.  I just saw a video clip of the police officers interrogating the boy - without a lawyer, without his mother - and getting a confession out of the boy after much coercion.  I literally got sick to my stomach seeing this clip, because it is such a huge violation of this child's rights as a victim and as a suspect.  He was not read his Miranda Rights (supposedly), and clearly had no adult to "stick up for him" during the interrogation.  You can hear the fear in his voice throughout the whole event.  He is due to appear in court today, and I hope this case (and I don't even care about his guilt or innocence) is thrown right out the window due to the flagrant violation of this child's rights. 

Got a dollar? Help a student!

  • Nov. 19th, 2008 at 12:08 PM


Howdy all!

As some of you may know, my wife Jennifer is a 9th Grade English teacher, and her classroom is in desperate need of some new books.  The problem of course is the school system, like the rest of us, doesn't currently have the money to fund this project.  Jen found a website that coordinates fundraising efforts, and through that site, you can donate as little as $1 - and every dollar counts - to this very noble cause.  Every donation is certainly tax deductible.  If you can spare a dollar (or more, if you so choose), please visit the following page.  If you can't, thanks for reading anyway!

www.donorschoose.org/donors/proposal.html

Thank you in advance for your support!

Latest Month

April 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by [info]chasethestars